COMPANY LAW/SEBI : Where appellant, promoter of target company, failed to make disclosures of change in shareholding in scrips of company and, thus, violated regulation 13 of PIT regulation and regulation 29 of SAST regulation, since, such transaction had neither caused disproportionate gain to appellant nor any loss to investors, penalty of Rs. 30 Lakh imposed on appellant was harsh and same was to be reduced to Rs. 3 lakh
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/research/direct-tax-laws/top-story/101010000000316785/sat-reduces-penalty-from-rs-30-lakhs-to-rs-3-lakhs-as-non-disclosure-by-appellant-didn’t-cause-any-loss-to-investors.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment