COMPETITION LAW : Where informant had entered into an agreement with OP-2 for custom milling of paddy, however OP-2 had not properly disclosed charges for custom milling, not properly reimbursed charges incurred by millers in providing services since last several years and unilaterally reduced rates of some services, conduct of OP-2 was an abuse of its dominant position as per provisions of section 4
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/3Dofp4Q
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment