INCOME TAX : Where order was passed under section 245 for adjustment of refund in excess of 20 per cent of disputed outstanding demand but it did not give any special/particular reasons as to why amount in excess of 20 per cent was recovered from assessee, since said order was contrary to Instruction No. 1914, dated 21-3-1996 which stipulates pre-deposit of only 20 per cent of disputed demand, Asstt. Commissioner was directed to refund amount adjusted in excess of 20 per cent of disputed demand
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/313MsNj
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment