INCOME TAX : Where assessee-employee was treated as ‘Resident’ for having stayed in India for 182 days during relevant previous year as per section 6(1)(a) but assessee claimed that he was on foreign water for a total period of 184 days and his residential status should have been taken as ‘Non-Resident’, since assessee’s employer had calculated his stay in India for 182 days and had deducted tax at source under section 192,
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/research/direct-tax-laws/top-story/101010000000317160/assessee-can’t-submit-evidence-for-first-time-before-hc-if-same-was-never-submitted-before-lower-authorities-hc.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment