INCOME TAX : Where no order had been passed by Assessing Officer under section 245 for adjustments of refunds and moreover, there was no order by Assessing Officer giving any special/particular reason as to why any amount in excess of 20 per cent of outstanding demand should be recovered from assessee in accordance with paragraph 4(B) of office memorandum dated 29-2-2016,
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/research/direct-tax-laws/top-story/101010000000316655/ao-can’t-recover-an-amount-in-excess-of-20-of-tax-to-grant-stay-of-demand-without-assigning-reasons-hc.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment