INCOME TAX : Where assessment in case of assessee-firm was sought to be reopened on ground that, assessee had claimed excessive deductions under section 80-IB(10), without providing interest on capital and remunerations to partners for respective years under consideration, however, record indicated that interest and remuneration was not to be paid to partners mandatorily, reopening was unjustified
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/research/direct-tax-laws/top-story/101010000000315665/no-reassessment-just-because-firm-didn’t-pay-interest-amp-remuneration-to-partner-if-same-wasn’t-mandatory-as-per-deed.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment