COMPANY LAW/SEBI : Where Adjudicating Authority passed order imposing penalty upon appellants for violating regulation 11(2) of takeover code and appeal against said order had been filed after delay of 577 days along with application seeking condonation of delay, and no sufficient cause for delay had been given in application, said application seeking condonation was to be rejected
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/research/direct-tax-laws/top-story/101010000000198516/inordinate-delay-in-filing-appeal-against-aa’s-order-for-sast-violations-without-sufficient-cause-to-be-rejected-sat.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment