COMPETITION LAW : Where OP1 being a largest port owner in India proposed a resolution plan for acquisition of OP2-Port which was approved by OP3 Resolution Professional and according to informant same would 'enhance and substantiate' OP1's dominant position in port sector which would adversely affect interest of competitors, since, there were no evidence of abusive conduct by OP1, mere existence of dominance bereft of any abusive conduct, could not be held to be basis to order an investigation
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/research/direct-tax-laws/top-story/101010000000314291/mere-existence-of-dominance-bereft-of-any-abusive-conduct-couldn’t-be-held-to-be-basis-to-order-investigation-cci.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment