EXCISE/ST/VAT : Where appellant only made investments in mutual fund and earned profit from it which was shown in Books of Account under head 'other income', he could not have been termed as 'service provider', hence, department had wrongly invoked provisions of rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 demanding reversal of credit on exempted services
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/3v1R7J7
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment