INCOME TAX : Intimation by police would not confer jurisdiction on revenue to detain and withhold cash by issuance of an invalid search warrant under section 132 for a future contingency, since revenue had no reason to believe that assessee would not disclose cash transaction in return of income
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/research/direct-tax-laws/top-story/101010000000197848/intimation-by-police-won’t-confer-jurisdiction-on-ao-to-issue-search-warrant-for-any-future-contingency-hc.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
INCOME TAX : Police should not be "acting at the behest of" MLA from whose premises a diary was seized in a search u/s 132 from ...
No comments:
Post a Comment