COMPETITION ACT : Where OP1 was a leading supplier of copper rods and other copper products in India and OP2 was a globally diversified and very large natural resources company, with interests in iron ore, steel, copper, aluminium, power, oil and gas and zinc-lead-silver and informant filed information against OPs alleging cartelisation in determining prices of certain copper products in India, sharing market of certain copper products by way of allocation of customers,
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/3nZTBF9
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
INCOME TAX : Once a refund is declared after scrutiny proceedings and such refund is withheld, a reasoned order has to follow because assess...
-
INCOME TAX : Police should not be "acting at the behest of" MLA from whose premises a diary was seized in a search u/s 132 from ...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment