Tuesday, September 15, 2020

Striking off of a Co.’s name by RoC without recording his satisfaction u/s 248(6) couldn’t be interfered with :HC

COMPANY LAW : Whether where appellant company was aggrieved as his name had been struck off by Registrar of Companies without recording his satisfaction in terms of section 248(6), just because there may be a mistake in order impugned or a different view was possible could not be good grounds for interference with under Article 227 of Constitution, despite existence of an alternative remedy of appeal

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/topstories/101010000000195824/striking-off-of-a-co-’s-name-by-roc-without-recording-his-satisfaction-us-2486-couldn’t-be-interfered-with-hc.aspx

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...