INCOME TAX : Where assessee was granted stay of demand on payment of 20 per cent of disputed tax demand and thereafter an attachment order was passed in terms of section 226(3) so as to insist assessee to pay such 20 per cent of tax demand, impugned attachment order would result in denial of benefit originally conferred upon assessee of allowing stay on payment of 20 percent of tax, therefore, impugned order of attachment was unjustified and same was to be set aside
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/304ED5y
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment