INCOME-TAX-I: Where assessee filed its return claiming deduction of bad debts under section 36(1)(vii) and submitted entire factual matrix in support of said claim, mere fact that revenue authorities found said claim inadmissible, it did not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income and, thus, impugned penalty order passed under section 271(1)(c) for raising such a claim, was to be set aside
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2BpS6fU
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment