INCOME TAX: Where Commissioner invoked revision jurisdiction for reason that against consideration of Rs. 45.61 lakh paid by assessee, for purchase of land stamp duty of such higher amount of Rs. 22.90 lakh was paid, thus, it was to be presumed that value of property would be higher and there was an undisclosed investment made by assessee, as per section 69B, since no addition could be made under said section merely on basis of presumption, impugned revision was unjustified
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/topstories/101010000000193103/sec-69b-additions-couldn’t-be-made-by-presuming-high-purchase-value-of-land-on-basis-of-amount-of-stamp-duty-paid.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment