COMPETITION ACT : Price parallelism, in absence of other evidence, in itself, may not be sufficient to launch a full fledged investigation, hence, where informant had provided information with regard to price parallelism in respect of two bidders, however, no material was brought on record by informant suggesting or indicating concert amongst them to submit such bids, conduct of bidders could not be said to be in contravention of Act and therefore information was to be closed
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/3fsfqZG
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment