Tuesday, April 7, 2020

ITAT rightly deleted sec. 68 additions as asseessee discharged its onus of proving credit worthiness of creditors: HC

INCOME TAX: Where first appellate authority had returned a clear finding of fact that assessee had discharged its onus of proving identity of creditors, genuineness of transactions and credit worthiness of creditors which finding of fact stood affirmed by Tribunal and revenue had not been able to show any perversity in aforesaid findings of fact by authorities below, Tribunal was right in holding that no addition could be made under section 68

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/3aPi4pX

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...