COMPANY LAW: Where Adjudicating Authority imposed penalty on appellant-stock-broker, for violation of provisions of regulations 3 and 4 of 2003 Regulations as it failed to carry out due diligence in registration of its client, in view of fact that appellate sought to file additional evidence such as PAN Card, KYC etc. obtained from client without obtaining leave of Tribunal in consonance with provisions of Order 41 Rule 27 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 such documents could not be entertained
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/371CSYE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment