Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Stock broker can't produce additional evidence to prove identity of its client without prior approval of Tribunal

COMPANY LAW: Where Adjudicating Authority imposed penalty on appellant-stock-broker, for violation of provisions of regulations 3 and 4 of 2003 Regulations as it failed to carry out due diligence in registration of its client, in view of fact that appellate sought to file additional evidence such as PAN Card, KYC etc. obtained from client without obtaining leave of Tribunal in consonance with provisions of Order 41 Rule 27 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 such documents could not be entertained

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/371CSYE

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...