Friday, February 21, 2020

Maturity proceeds from insurance policy couldn't be taxed by applying Explanation to Sec. 10(10D) retrospectively

INCOME TAX : Amendment brought in by Finance Act 2013 in Explanation 1 to section 10 (10D) is prospective in nature and, thus, where keyman insurance policy taken by a company in name of assessee's husband was assigned to assessee in year 2013, it would continue to be an ordinary policy and consequently, sum received by her on maturity of said policy would not be taxable by virtue of amended section 10(10D)

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2ujf4lF

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...