COMPETITION ACT : Where Informant, engaged in manufacture of high performance and highly sophisticated machines for track maintenance, track laying and track renewal, alleged that OP-3, OP-4 and OP-6 colluded in furnishing bids in response to tenders floated by OP-5 i.e., Ministry of Railways, in violation of provisions of section 3(3), since there was no material on record which could suggest collusion amongst bidders,
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/38h5Kxs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment