INCOME TAX: Where High Court upheld Tribunal's order holding that section 32 covered certain intangible assets for depreciation and, thus, claim raised by assessee being a plausible claim, mere fact that same was withdrawn during subsequent search proceedings would not give rise to penalty under section 271(1)(C) SLP filed against said order was to be dismissed
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/3aBmm4C
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment