GST : Where applicant contended that, product Rubaloy is covered under Excise Schedule Entry C-54 but Note-3 appended to Notification No. VAT 1505/CR-234 stated that if description in Notification matches fully with corresponding description in Central Excise Tariff, then all commodities covered by tariff will be covered by scope of notification and thus, applicant needs to prove that impugned product is covered by Heading 4005, however, since applicant did not produce relevant documents and pro
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/topstories/101010000000192328/aar-rejects-application-as-applicant-fails-to-produce-relevant-documents-to-determine-gst-rate-of-product-‘rubaloy’.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment