COMPANY LAW: Where appellant, a premier institute for coaching for management, incorporated R1 company as a franchisee of appellant with appellant, R2 and R3 as its shareholders agreeing that R2 and R3 would not, while agreement would be in force, enter into a competing business, when said franchise agreement was terminated, it would be unreasonable restriction that respondents would be restrained from doing competitive business
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2qNfkYq
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
INCOME TAX : Police should not be "acting at the behest of" MLA from whose premises a diary was seized in a search u/s 132 from ...
No comments:
Post a Comment