Friday, November 29, 2019

Respondent-co. couldn't be restrained from doing business after termination of franchisee agreement

COMPANY LAW: Where appellant, a premier institute for coaching for management, incorporated R1 company as a franchisee of appellant with appellant, R2 and R3 as its shareholders agreeing that R2 and R3 would not, while agreement would be in force, enter into a competing business, when said franchise agreement was terminated, it would be unreasonable restriction that respondents would be restrained from doing competitive business

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2qNfkYq

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...