COMPETITION LAW: Where informant engaged in business of manufacturing and marketing of beer had alleged that Department of Excise (DoE) had contravened provisions of section 3(4) by setting a discount price control mechanism on L1 licensees, in view of fact that DoE was not involved in production, storage, distribution or sale of beer and no vertical agreement existed in present matter, need of examination of present matter in framework of provisions of section 3(4) was ruled out
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2o2rafm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment