INCOME TAX : Where a corrigendum to order under section 143(3) was issued in terms of which section under which penalty proceedings were initiated was to be read as section 271AAB instead of section 271AAA, since there is no substantial difference between two sections except in respect of applicability which depends upon date when search has been initiated, plea raised by assessee that he should have been given an opportunity of hearing before issue of corrigendum, deserved to be rejected
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2pyO8eT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment