Monday, October 14, 2019

HC upholds rejection of application seeking absolute stay of demand; deposit of 40% of demand justified

INCOME TAX : Where Assessing Officer rejected application seeking absolute stay observing that assessee could not prove identity, creditworthiness of companies, who contributed to share capital as well as genuineness of transaction and thereafter Single Judge of High Court passed order directing assessee to deposit 40 per cent of enforceable demand and to furnish security for 35 per cent of enforceable demand, order passed by Single Judge was an equitable order and did not require interference

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2MH1ZaO

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...