INCOME TAX : The Supreme Court issued a court notice to the assessee-company but no one appeared on behalf of the company. Thereafter, a dasti notice (a notice served in person) of court proceedings was served upon the Chartered Accountant (an authorized representative of the company)but he failed to communicate the same to the company. Therefore, the Supreme Court passed an ex-parte order asassessee remained unrepresented despite service of in-person upon its authorised representative
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/topstories/101010000000191331/ex-parte-order-against-client-can’t-be-recalled-if-in-person-notice-was-served-to-its-ca-sc.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment