COMPANY LAW : Where complaint was instituted by respondent No.2 i.e. Nusli Wadia for offence of defamation alleging that act of petitioner i.e. Ratan Tata in issuing special notice under section 169(2) read with section 115 alongwith brief background about conduct of Nusli Wadia for his removal as director of relevant Tata Companies was defamatory statement and by impugned order process was issued against petitioner for offences punishable under sections 500 and 34 of Indian Penal Code,
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2T0Fctm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment