INCOME TAX/BENAMI PROPERTY ACT: Where applicant company returned an amount received from a company towards supply of ceramic tiles on finding out that said company was not genuine and it was involved in money laundering activity, applicant could not be held to be a beneficial owner of amount in question
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2OHyAlb
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
INCOME TAX : Police should not be "acting at the behest of" MLA from whose premises a diary was seized in a search u/s 132 from ...
No comments:
Post a Comment