IT: Where High Court upheld Tribunal's order that land sold by assessee did not fall within meaning of capital asset under section 2(14) as it was classified as dry land for which Kishtu had been paid and, moreover, mere fact that adjacent land was divided into plots for sale could not a ground to conclude that land sold by assessee was for purpose of development, SLP filed against order of High Court was to be dismissed
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2JjduUi
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment