SLP dismissed against HC's ruling that question raised on period of stay of demand wasn't question of law

IT : Where High Court held that question raised by revenue to effect that as to whether Tribunal's order was to be treated as void-ab-initio in light of third proviso to section 254(2A) which provided that stay of demand would stand vacated after expiry of a period of 365 days, even if delay in disposal of appeal was not attributable to assessee, was not a substantial question of law, SLP filed against order of High Court was to be dismissed

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws http://bit.ly/2Msva4s