Competition Law : Where informant who was non-exclusive distributor of South Delhi for distribution of mobile handsets of Vivo (OP) filed information alleging contravention of section 3 by OP by restricting online sale of Vivo phones and maintaining Minimum Operation Price (MOP), it was held that Vivo smartphones were adequately available in both offline market as well as on online market like Flipkart, Snapdeal, Amazon, Paytmall, Official Vivo e-store etc.
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/topstories/101010000000188824/no-competition-issue-against-vivo-phone-as-distributor-wasn’t-restricted-from-dealing-with-other-brands.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
INCOME TAX : Once a refund is declared after scrutiny proceedings and such refund is withheld, a reasoned order has to follow because assess...
-
INCOME TAX : Police should not be "acting at the behest of" MLA from whose premises a diary was seized in a search u/s 132 from ...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment