IT: Where revenue challenged impugned order passed by Settlement Commission under section 245D(2C) on ground that same was passed without passing an order under section 245D(3) requiring a further enquiry into certain transactions of assessee, since department had not set out any grounds and reasons why in facts of case, such enquiry or investigation as envisaged under section 245D(3) was necessary, impugned order passed under section 245D(2C) was justified
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws http://bit.ly/2IJTXvI
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment