CL: Where appellant company claimed to be shareholder of R1 company alleged that shares transferred to it from original allottees were illegally transferred to third party, in view of fact that appellant had not produced any proof to substantiate its version and application seeking rectification of members was filed by appellant after a period of 21 years from date of allotment, appellant could not challenge impugned transfer
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws http://bit.ly/2H5WYWt
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
INCOME TAX : Once a refund is declared after scrutiny proceedings and such refund is withheld, a reasoned order has to follow because assess...
-
INCOME TAX : Police should not be "acting at the behest of" MLA from whose premises a diary was seized in a search u/s 132 from ...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment