CL : Where appellant filed a suit for declaration of title with respect to premises and prayed that he be declared owner of premises and that sale deed dated 24-7-2006 executed by first defendant in favour of second defendant be cancelled and second defendant submitted an application under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure praying for rejection of plaint on ground that suit was barred under section 4 of Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988,
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/topstories/101010000000187405/suit-challenging-transaction-falling-us-43b-isn’t-barred-us-4-of-benami-property-act-sc.aspx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment