Allegation of bid suppression couldn't be substantiated as OP didn't participate in tender floated by railways

Competition Act: Where in a tender floated by railways, informant alleged that due to alleged non-participation of OP1 in impugned tender, OP-2, being only remaining approved vendor, enjoyed a monopoly status, and quoted high rate, since, non-participation of OP-1 was due to its inability to produce item as quoted in tender floated by Railway allegation of bid suppression by OP-1 in collusion with OP-2 was unsubstantiated

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2GKs8VK