CL : Where respondent No. 2 had written off dues recoverable by respondent company from Diaster Inc. of USA which was family held company managed by respondent No. 2 and had excluded his brother i.e., appellant, from management and affairs of respondent company although he held more than 50 per cent shares in company, action of respondent was oppressive of appellant-shareholders and respondent was guilty of oppression and mismanagement
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws http://bit.ly/2S05XA6
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment