Appellant/plaintiff claimed that though registered Sale Deed dated 26-11-2001 of suit property was in name of his wife and three sons, (Respondents) but since only appellant/plaintiff had paid entire sale consideration for purchasing suit property, therefore it was appellant/plaintiff who was actual owner of suit property. Hence, he filed plaint seeking reliefs of declaration, possession, use and occupation charges etc.
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws http://bit.ly/2AYsDqu
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
INCOME TAX : Police should not be "acting at the behest of" MLA from whose premises a diary was seized in a search u/s 132 from ...
No comments:
Post a Comment