Wednesday, January 23, 2019

No vested rights is taken away if exempted transactions were included in amended Benami Act: Delhi HC

Appellant/plaintiff claimed that though registered Sale Deed dated 26-11-2001 of suit property was in name of his wife and three sons, (Respondents) but since only appellant/plaintiff had paid entire sale consideration for purchasing suit property, therefore it was appellant/plaintiff who was actual owner of suit property. Hence, he filed plaint seeking reliefs of declaration, possession, use and occupation charges etc.

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws http://bit.ly/2AYsDqu

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...