Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Applicant couldn't be discharged from charges as he played an active role in diverting funds received by co.

CL: Where charges under sections 24 and 27 were framed against applicant, who was working as Chartered Accountant of company 'WWML' on account of its failure to repay amount accepted from depositors, in view of fact that applicant had played an active role in flats purchased by company from amount of deposits received from public and, moreover, he had got transferred amount of investors from account of directors in name of his father and wife, his application seeking discharge was rightly reject

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws http://bit.ly/2G5DZMY

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...