‘OPPO’ didn’t abuse its dominant position due to presence of other players in market: CCI

Competition Act: Where OP 'OPPO' had entered into a sub-distributorship agreement with Informant and informant alleged that on claiming of outstanding dues, OP had sought to terminate said agreement on ground of violation of different clauses of agreement and according to it said clauses were anti-competitive in view of fact that impugned clauses neither created any barriers to entry in market, nor drive existing competitors out of market, clauses of said agreement could not be said to be anti-c

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://www.taxmann.com/topstories/101010000000184989/‘oppo’-didn’t-abuse-its-dominant-position-due-to-presence-of-other-players-in-market-cci.aspx