IT : Where there was no specific details brought in by assessee which could show that assessee had entered into a contract for hedging of forward trading of its goods to guard against loss through price fluctuation which might arise from contracts for delivery of goods, hedging loss arising from alleged contracts did not fall under proviso (a) of section 43(5); therefore, alleged hedging loss claimed by assessee was to be disallowed
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws http://bit.ly/2Ta1Sq2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment