PMLA : Where respondents i.e., Vijay Mallaya had been accused for offence u/s 3 and appellant had purchased a property in a project developed by respondents after paying entire consideration and appellant had no family relation with any of respondents, appellant not being involved in offence of money laundering her property could not be attached as same was not involved in money laundering
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2OLCjt5
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment