IT : Where petitioner had failed to make full and true disclosure of undisclosed income with reference to London property and two foreign bank accounts in bank at Singapore, of which petitioner was a beneficial and de facto owner i.e. he had failed to adduce specific and clear evidence to show that he was not beneficial owner of said accounts and London property was owned by his brother-in-law, ITSC had rightly rejected settlement application filed by petitioner as invalid
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2ojGrFp
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment