Thursday, August 16, 2018

PWD-OP was not in dominant position for execution of civil construction work in State of Haryana

Competition Act: Where considering market share, size and resources, dependency of contractors on PWD for supplying their services for construction of roads and bridges, entry barriers, it was found that PWD was not in dominant position in execution of works of roads, buildings, bridges and other civil construction works in State of Haryana, there could not be case of abuse of dominance by PWD in terms of section 4

from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2MQaa3y

No comments:

Post a Comment

AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT

INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...