IT : Where Commissioner passed a revisional order directing Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271D, in view of fact that said revisional order was set aside by Tribunal, consequential order of Assessing Officer under section 144 read with section 263 did not survive and thus, penalty imposed in said order also deserved to be deleted
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2ITnSov
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
In order to provide more avenues for transacting in mutual fund units, the SEBI has issued discussion paper on ‘Usage of pool accounts in Mu...
-
IT : Where during search conducted upon premises of assessee's cousin, key belonging to assessee's locker was found and search warra...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment