CL: Where a finance company namely 'AFIC' entered into an agreement with R1 bank and assigned petitioner's debt to it but according to petitioner, another company namely 'ACTIS' had executed assignment agreement in favour of Bank whereas, it had financial dealing with AFIC, since, challenge raised by petitioner in instant petition did not come within purview of section 141 of 1956 Act, and it would be open for petitioner to raise challenge relating to documents, its enforceability, execution bef
from www.taxmann.com Latest Case Laws https://ift.tt/2GOfUXy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AO can’t disallow cost of improvement merely relying on enquiries made with assessee’s neighbour: ITAT
INCOME TAX : Where assessee had purchased a flat and incurred expenditure of Rs. 23 lakhs for purpose of renovating house and Assessing Offi...
-
INCOME TAX : Once a refund is declared after scrutiny proceedings and such refund is withheld, a reasoned order has to follow because assess...
-
INCOME TAX : Police should not be "acting at the behest of" MLA from whose premises a diary was seized in a search u/s 132 from ...
-
2018 Witnesses Highest FPI Registrations in Four Years from taxmann.com News http://bit.ly/2V8m1i1
No comments:
Post a Comment